← All articles

How UAE Ecommerce Stores Can Monitor Competitor Prices Without Spreadsheets

A practical guide for UAE ecommerce retailers on tracking competitor prices, stock, promotions and product changes without relying on spreadsheets.

autoPricely Team ·

why ecommerce stores outgrow spreadsheets

For many ecommerce businesses in UAE, price monitoring still starts with a spreadsheet.

Someone on the team opens competitor websites, searches for the same products, records the latest prices in Excel, compares them with the store’s own prices, and then decides what needs to change. The updated prices may then be uploaded to their own CMS.

For a small catalogue, there is nothing inherently wrong with this approach.

If you sell 30 products, have two important competitors and only need to check your fastest moving products once a week, a spreadsheet might be all you need.

The problem starts when the business grows.

Imagine you have 700 products and one competitor whose brand is regularly compared with yours by customers. Even before adding a second or third competitor, you potentially have hundreds of products to find, verify and compare.

And the job isn’t simply copying one number from one website into another. You have to make sure it is the same product. The Same pack size. The same model. The same variant. And you need to check whether the product is actually in stock, whether the price is part of a temporary promotion, and whether responding to that price even makes commercial sense for your business.

At that point, competitor monitoring stops being a spreadsheet problem.

I learned this problem while doing ecommerce price comparison myself

Before working on pricing technology, I experienced this process from the merchant’s side.

While working as an ecommerce manger, one of my responsibilities was price comparison across approximately 20 brands.

Every week, I would go through products, compare our prices against competing stores and update the information we were using to make pricing decisions.
But competitor monitoring wasn’t my only responsibility. There was inventory management. Product updates. Coordination. Merchandising. And the other operational tasks that naturally land on an ecommerce manager’s desk.

By the time I had completed one round of price comparisons, it often felt like Monday had arrived again and it was time to start the process from scratch.

That is the part of manual competitor monitoring that is easy to underestimate. The cost isn’t only the hours spent copying prices. It is also the work that doesn’t get done because someone is busy collecting the information required to make the pricing decision in the first place.

This becomes particularly relevant for smaller UAE eommerce businesses. In a large organization, pricing, procurement, inventory and ecommerce operation may be handled by different people. However, in a smaller reseller, one person may be managing several of those functions at once.

When that person spends a significant portion of the week finding competitor prices, there is less time available to analyze the information, improve inventory turnover, negotiate with suppliers, plan promotions or work on growth.

In these cases, automation shouldn’t simply be viewed as a way of “checking prices faster.” The bigger question becomes:

How much of your team’s time is being spent on collecting pricing information instead of deciding what to do with it?

Why spreadsheets work until they don’t?

Spreadsheets are actually a good starting point for competitor monitoring. A simple sheet might contain:

  • Product name
  • SKU
  • Current price
  • Competitor name
  • Difference in AED
  • Difference in percentage
  • Date checked

This gives a merchant a perfectly usable picture of the market for a smaller number of products. The difficulty is scale.

A 400 products check against three relevant competitors gives you as many as 1,200 product to competitor relationship to keep track of. And these relationships are not static.

A competitor can change a price after you check it. A product can go out of stock. A promotion can start. A promotion can end. A new bundle can appear. Or the same product might suddenly be listed under a slightly different name.

Your spreadsheet tells you what the market looked like when someone checked it. It doesn’t necessarily tell you what the market looks like now.

That distinction matters when prices influence purchasing decisions.

Competitor pricing isn’t just about finding the cheapest price

One of the easiest mistakes to make is to reduce competitor monitoring to a single question:
“Who is selling this product cheaper than us?”

For a reseller, that isn’t enough information to make a good pricing decision based off of. The lowest price might be important.

But your pricing decision also depends on your margin, supplier terms, inventory position, promotional calendar and what you are trying to achieve with that particular product.

Different suppliers can mean very different margins

UAE resellers frequently source products across multiple suppliers or distributors. And not every supplier gives you the same commercial terms. You might receive a strong discount on one brand and a much smaller discount on another.

Two products selling for AED 200 don’t necessarily give you anything close to the same margin. Consider a simplified example.

You sell product A for AED 200 and have a healthy margin. A competitor reduces it to AED 185. Matching them might be commercially reasonable. But you also sell product B for AED 200 where your supplier gives you far less room.

If competitor reduces that product to AED 185, matching them could make very little sense.

The competitor price is a signal. It is not automatically your new price.

This is why useful competitor monitoring should eventually help a merchant answer two separate questions:

What is happening in the market?

and

Given my own economics, should I respond?

Those are very different questions.

Your inventory position should influence how you react to competitors

Inventory adds another layer to the pricing decisions. Suppose you have just received stock of a popular product and expect healthy demand over the next few months.

There may be little reason to aggressively follow every competitor discount.

Now consider another product that has been sitting in your warehouse for months. Your priorities are different for this specific product.

A merchant might be willing to accept a lower margin on ageing stock to release cash tied up in inventory.

That doesn’t mean the same pricing strategy should be applied to the rest of the catalogue.

This is why an ecommerce store shouldn’t necessarily have one universal rule such as: Always match the cheapest competitor.

The right response can depend on the purpose of the product within your business.

For some products, the goal might be protecting margin. For others, it might be remaining highly competitive. For aging inventory, the goal might be stock clearance. While for a hero product, it might simply be making sure customers don’t perceive the entire store as expensive.

Promotional seasons make UAE pricing even more dynamic

This becomes particularly noticeable around major UAE retail periods.

Dubai Shopping Festival, Ramadan and Eid campaigns, 11.11 promotions, White Friday / Black Friday sales and other seasonal campaigns can create periods where retailers change prices much more aggressively than they normally would.

A competitor dropping a product from AED 249 to AED 199 doesn’t necessarily mean AED 199 has become the new normal market price.

It could be:

  • a three-day campaign
  • clearance of old inventory
  • a supplier funded promotio
  • a temporary loss leader
  • or simply a competitor willing to operate at a margin you aren’t prepared to accept

If you record only the current price in a spreadsheet, much of that context disappears. A few weeks later, someone reviewing the sheet may simply see:

Competitor: AED 199 without knowing whether that price lasted three months or three days.

This is where price history becomes far more useful than another column in an Excel file. Instead of only asking, “What does this competitor charge today?”, a merchant should increasingly be able to ask:
Is this their normal price or a temporary promotion?

How often do they discount this product?
When was their last price change?

How quickly did their price return to normal?

That information produces a much better pricing decision than a single snapshot.

Product matching is one of the most time-consuming parts of manual monitoring

Another problem a lot of merchants face is when a product has a lot of different variables like color, size or weight.
This sounds straightforward when every retailer exposes the manufacturer’s SKU or model number.

Many don’t.

Imagine you sell perfumes. Your catalogue might contain:


Brand X Eau de Parfum - 50ml

and

Brand X Eau de Parfum - 100ml

A competitor may simply display:

Brand X EDP for Men with the size buried further down the product page.

The same problem appears across many reseller categories.

A supplement might contain 30 servings or 60. Pet food might come in 2kg and 10kg bags. A skincare product may be available individually or as part of a twin pack. An electronics retailer may sell the same device name with different storage capacities, model years, specifications or regional versions.

Even a small mistake can produce a completely misleading comparison.

Your 100ml perfume at AED 220 may appear expensive next to a competitor selling “the same product” for AED 165. Only after opening the page do you discover that their listing is for 50ml.

The actual problem wasn’t your price. It was product match.

Missing SKUs make the process much slower

SKU or manufacture-part-number matching can make monitoring relatively straightforward. But when a competitor doesn’t display these identifiers publicly, someone often has to compare products manually.

That means checking:

  • Product titles
  • Images
  • Brand
  • Specifications
  • Pack size
  • Model
  • Colour
  • Capacity
  • Volume
  • and sometimes the product description itself

Multiply that process across hundreds of products and multiple competitors and it becomes one of the biggest hidden costs of manual prices monitoring.

This is also why simply “scraping competitor websites” doesn’t completely solve the problem.

Collecting a price from a webpage is only useful if you are confident that the price belongs to the correct product.

Bad product matching creates bad pricing intelligence.

Stock availability matters almost as much as price

Consider this situation:

Your price: AED 149

Competitor A: AED 139

At first glance, you are AED 10 more expensive. You might immediately consider reducing your price. But then you open the competitor’s product page.

Out of stock.

Does AED 139 deserve the same weight as the price from a competitor who can actually fulfill an order today?

Probably not.

The same principle applies when analyzing several competitors.

Suppose the market looks like this:

price comparison table

Looking only at the lowest number makes your AED 149 price appears uncompetitive. But looking at the market properly tells a different story.

You are AED 2 above the cheapest competitor who actually has inventory available. That is a much more useful piece of pricing information.

So what should a UAE reseller actually monitor?

At a minimum, competitor monitoring should move beyond having one “competitor price” column.

For important products, merchants should think about monitoring:

Current selling price
What a customer actually pay for the product today?
Where possible, distinguish the current selling price from regular or crossed out price.

Product availability

Is the competitor actually able to sell the product?

An unavailable low price may have far less relevance to your immediate pricing decision.

Promotions

Is the competitor’s price part of a campaign or does it appear to be their normal selling price?

Price history

Was the competitor selling the product at the same price last week? Has the price suddenly dropped? Has it been steadily falling?

Historical information helps separate market movements from temporary promotions.

Correct product match

Making sure the merchant is comparing like for like. Pack sizes, product variants, storage capacity, model numbers, bundles and quantities matter.

Your own margin

A competitor’s price tells you what another business is willing to charge. It doesn’t tell you what you can afford to charge.

Your inventory position

The right price for a fast-selling product with limited stock can be very different from the right price for inventory that has been sitting in the warehouse for six months.

The goal isn’t to monitor every competitor

Another mistake is assuming that good price monitoring means collecting as much data as possible.
Most UAE ecommerce stores don’t need to monitor every website selling every product they carry.

You need to identify the competitors that actually influence your customers.

If customers regularly compare your store with three particular retailers, those three competitors may matter significantly more than another 20 websites that happen to carry some of the same products.

The same applies to your catalogue.

Not every SKU deserves the same monitoring frequency. Your high revenue products, fast moving products, highly competitive branded products and products customers regularly compare may deserve much closer attention than long-tail items that sell occasionally.

The objective isn’t to create the largest pricing spreadsheet possible. It is to collect enough relevant information to make better pricing decisions.

When does it make sense to move away from spreadsheets?

There is no specific number of products where a spreadsheet suddenly stops working.

The better signal is what the process is costing your business.
You may have outgrown manual monitoring when:

  • Someone spends hours every week checking prices
  • your team repeatedly checks the same competitor pages
  • prices are already outdates by the time comparisons are completed
  • matching products across websites has become a recurring workload
  • you cannot easily tell whether a competitor’s discount is new or normal
  • stock availability changes the meaning of your price comparisons
  • several people need to maintain the same pricing information
  • or collecting pricing data leaves little time to actually analyze it

At that stage, the first thing to automate doesn’t necessarily have to be the pricing decision. It can simply be the collection and organization of competitor data.

That is an important distinction.

A merchant doesn’t have to hand complete control of pricing to an algorithm simply because they stop using Excel.

A sensible progression can look like this:

Step 1: Manual monitoring

A spreadsheet works while the catalogue and competitor set are manageable.

Step 2: Automated price monitoring

Technology collets competitors prices and availability on a schedule, while the merchant still decides what to change.

Step 3: Pricing rules

The business defines conditions under which price changes should be considered.


For example:
Match Competitor A when they are in stock, but never sell below AED 120.

Or
Alert me when our price becomes more than 5% higher than the lowest relevant in-stock competitor

Only once the merchant understand their margins, competitors and pricing strategy does deeper repricing automation become useful.

Automation should remove data collection, not pricing judgement

This is ultimately the most important distinction.

The purpose of competitor price monitoring isn’t to make your store the cheapest store in the UAE.

Constantly undercutting competitors is not a pricing strategy.

The purpose is to know what is happening in your market quickly enough to make an informed decision.

Sometimes the right decision will be to lower your price. Sometimes it will be to run a promotion. Sometimes it will be to clear aging inventory. And sometimes the best decision will be to do absolutely nothing.

Good pricing still requires judgement.

For growing UAE ecommerce businesses, the biggest improvement often isn’t replacing that judgement with automation. It is removing the repetitive work that prevents merchants from having enough time to exercise that judgement in the first place.